Universal Orchestrator RPC
Abstract
“Hey smart speaker, swap my Shiba Inu for Pillar”
“Assistant, how much USDC can I buy with what’s in my wallet?”
“Send 10 OP to Vitalik and 5 PEPE to Deimantas”
The Universal Orchestrator RPC aims to standardise the minimum shape and requirements of a request for a solution from an arbitrary system managing an Ethereum wallet to, ultimately, an Orchestrator.
An arbitrary system could be a website, device, app, server program etc - anything that manages an Ethereum wallet, speaks Ethereum JSON-RPC and is looking to request solutions from an Orchestrator.
All solutions from an Orchestrator are ChA¹ (Chain Abstraction-first) by default.

Motivation
Data model standards can be written in any shape. A system will often expose their external interface but require that the request to the aforementioned interface is modelled in a way that the service understands. This creates a huge level of inconsistency and in turn makes Orchestrator interoperability more difficult.
Orchestrators will become more widespread and numerous over time. This is especially true with the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven systems, the continued advancement of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) devices (especially those that are voice controlled) and the emergence of Extended Reality (XR) platforms.
Standardising the request object that an Orchestrator can understand from a wallet will drive adoption and make decentralised app development easier for developers that don’t know how to make on-chain transactions or have the required technical understanding of block building systems.
Specification
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
The Orchestrator’s external interface(s) that expose functionality to an end-user application or another system MUST use JavaScript Object Notation (JSON).
The following data definitions are available and MUST prefer chain abstraction (ChA¹), unless stated. Chain abstraction means that, where possible, should an asset span multiple chains - expect a solution from an Orchestrator to use and send assets to and from the supported chains to deliver a complete and cost-effective solution.
The following sequence diagram shows the flow of events in this proposal:

This specification follows the top level data shape of Ethereum JSON-RPC requests, as shown below:
Request
The request definition is what a wallet sends to an Orchestrator for solutions to one or more problems. The request follows the specification from Ethereum JSON-RPC.
RPC
interface Rpc: {
id: number; // REQUIRED
jsonrpc: string; // REQUIRED
method: string; // REQUIRED
params: Problem[]; // REQUIRED
}
The top level definition is an Ethereum RPC object.
- The
idproperty is a random number that you can assign for your own purposes. - The
jsonrpcproperty takes astringthat represents the version of JSON-RPC being used. Usually"2.0". - The
methodproperty is the method call intended for the Orchestrator, and by default CAN beorchestrator_findSolutions. - The
paramsproperty contains an array ofProblemobjects, and is REQUIRED. The Problem object is defined below.
Problem
interface Problem: {
actions: Action[] // REQUIRED
chainId: number; // OPTIONAL
}
The Problem definition has just one REQUIRED property, actions. The Problem interface leaves space for additional properties in future network upgrades and existing or emerging standards.
- The
actionsproperty takes anarrayofActionobjects, defined below, and is REQUIRED. - The
chainIdtakes anumber, representing the chain ID, and is OPTIONAL.- If no
chainIdis provided:chainIdproperty MUST assume1
- If no
Action
interface Action: {
from: string; // REQUIRED
towards: (Asset|Destination)[]; // REQUIRED
with: Offering[]; // OPTIONAL
type: string; // OPTIONAL
functionCallName: string; // OPTIONAL
functionCallData: string; // OPTIONAL
deadline: number; // OPTIONAL
}
The Action definition has several properties that indicate the desired action. The set properties determine the action that needs to be solved.
- The
fromproperty is REQUIRED, takes astringand represents the wallet that thisActionis for. - The
towardsproperty is REQUIRED, takes anarrayof either anAssetor aDestinationtype and represents where thisActionis targeted towards. - The
withproperty is OPTIONAL, takes anarrayofOfferingtype and represents what assets the wallet is prepared to offer to facilitate thisAction- If the
withproperty contains noOfferingentries, then the Orchestrator MUST consider all assets available in the address space for anOffering.
- If the
- The
typeproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand is intended to help classify this action. Examples might include, but are not limited to -transfer,swap,calletc and is intended to assist the Orchestrator with the action.- If no
typeis provided, then ‘transfer’ MUST be assumed
- If no
- The
functionCallNameproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand represents the function name to call against thetowardsproperty. If this is defined, the Orchestrator can be assumed that this Action desires to call a smart contract as part of the action. - The
functionCallDataproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand represents the data payload forfunctionCallName. If this is defined butfunctionCallNameis not, this property SHOULD be ignored. - The
deadlineproperty is OPTIONAL, takes anumberand represents a wallet-defined unix timestamp for when an action should have a solution by. Useful for high throughput systems, or time sensitive actions.
Asset
interface Asset: {
symbol: string; // OPTIONAL
address: string; // OPTIONAL
chainId: number; // OPTIONAL
}
The Asset definition defines an asset in question. This definition prefers chain abstraction.
- The
symbolproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand represents the symbol of the Asset in question.- if no
symbolis provided,addressmust be used
- if no
- The
addressproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand represents theaddressof the smart contract for thisAsset.- if no
addressis provided, the native gas token MUST be used
- if no
- The
chainIdproperty is OPTIONAL, takes anumberand represents the chain that this asset resides on. Useful for direct targeting of anAsseton a particular chain. - If no
chainIdis provided: - The Orchestrator is free to use any corresponding asset on any chain to facilitate the action
Destination
interface Destination: {
address: string; // REQUIRED
chainId: number; // REQUIRED
}
The Destination definition defines a direct target and is used in scenarios where the Orchestrator interpretation MUST NOT be used.
- The
addressproperty is REQUIRED and takes astringthat represents the address space for thisDestination. - The
chainIdproperty is REQUIRED and takes anumberand represents the chain the aboveaddressproperty resides on.
Offering
interface Offering: {
symbol: string; // SHOULD
address: string; // SHOULD
amount: (number|string); // OPTIONAL
chainId: number; // OPTIONAL
}
The Offering definition defines what the requester is willing to spend from their wallet in order to facilitate the action being solved.
- The
symbolproperty SHOULD be specified and represents the symbol of theOfferingin question- If no
symbolis provided, the address MUST be used
- If no
- The
addressproperty SHOULD be specified and takes astringthat represents the address space for thisOffering.- If no
addressis provided, the native gas token MUST be used
- If no
- The
amountproperty is OPTIONAL and represents the amount to be offered as part of theAction. Accepts either anumber, which represents an ether unit, or astringwhich can be used for BigNumbers.- If no amount is provided, the maximum value of the address, symbol or native gas unit must be assumed
- The
chainIdproperty is OPTIONAL and takes anumberthat represents the chain the aboveaddressproperty resides on.- If no
chainIdis provided:addressMUST NOT be usedsymbolMUST be used (ChA¹)- If no higher level
chainIdproperty exists in theProblemproperty- The Orchestrator is free to use any corresponding asset on any chain to facilitate the action (ChA¹)
- If no
Response
The response definition is what an Orchestrator sends back as a response to the request for solutions from a wallet. The response, like the request, follows the specification from Ethereum JSON-RPC.
RPC
interface Rpc: {
id: string; // REQUIRED
jsonrpc: string; // REQUIRED
result: Solution[]; // REQUIRED
}
The top level object is an Ethereum RPC object.
- The
idproperty is REQUIRED, takes astringand MUST correlate to the samenumberthat was received as part of the request object to the Orchestrator. - The
jsonrpcproperty is REQUIRED, takes astringand represents the version of JSON-RPC being used. Usually"2.0". - The
resultproperty is REQUIRED and takes an array ofSolutionobjects. TheSolutionobject is defined below.
Solution
interface Solution: {
name: string; // REQUIRED
description: string; // OPTIONAL
transactions: Transaction[]; // REQUIRED
deadline: number; // OPTIONAL
}
The above Solution interface is the solution to a problem requested above. The Solution MUST be in the same order to a Problem that was requested.
- The
nameproperty is REQUIRED, takes astringand represents a short, non-technical and user-friendly, name of the solution. - The
descriptionproperty is OPTIONAL, takes astringand represents a longer, non-technical and user-friendly, description of the solution. - The
transactionsproperty is REQUIRED, takes anarrayofTransactionobjects and represents one or more transactions needed for the user to execute the solution. - The
deadlineproperty is OPTIONAL, takes anumberand represents a unix timestamp by which thisSolutionshould be executed. This is defined by the Orchestrator.
Transaction
interface Transaction: {
to: Destination; // REQUIRED
chainId: number; // REQUIRED
amount: (number|string); // REQUIRED
calldata: string; // OPTIONAL
}
The above Transaction interface is a transaction definition that allows a wallet to perform their solution to a problem. There may be 1 or more transactions for a Solution.
- The
toproperty is REQUIRED, takes aDestinationtype and represents the target for this Solution. - The
chainIdproperty is REQUIRED, takes a number and represents the chain that thisTransactionis targeted at. ThechainIdis REQUIRED here because the wallet MUST know where to send assets from as an origin due to the existence of multichain assets. - The
amountproperty is REQUIRED and represents the amount to be sent as part of theTransaction. Accepts either anumber, which represents an ether unit, or astringwhich can be used for BigNumbers.
Rationale
- Uses the Ethereum JSON-RPC JSON wrapper for greater compatibility.
- The interface definitions use only generic primitive types to ensure wide compatibility for any programming language.
- The interface definitions defined in this ERC attempts to cover as many scenarios as possible, from an Orchestrator perspective that a wallet may ask for, but focuses on core blockchain functionality.
- Certain high-level definitions, such as the
Problemobject definition, are sparse by design to allow space for future features introduced by other ERC’s or network upgrades. - Terminology is targeted towards a non-technical lexicon to aid in wider adoption and understanding.
- Nearly all options are REQUIRED, SHOULD and OPTIONAL to allow for both wallet and Orchestrator flexibility in providing solutions for the wallet request.
- It’s understood that the Orchestrator interpretations and implementations will vary, so where possible the specification enforces REQUIRED and MUST to provide a universal level of service to an end-user or another service.
- The specification is NOT intended to standardise or modify the internal data structure or communication layer of an Orchestrator.
- Other parameters that could be considered, such as gas limits and estimations, are delegated back to the wallet as ultimately it is the wallet that will execute the solution(s).
Backwards Compatibility
No backward compatibility issues found.
Reference Implementation
Example requests and responses for solutions
The following examples show a few common scenarios with their requests to, and from, an Orchestrator. All examples are chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default, unless specified.
Sending an ERC-20 token to another address
The following request performs an action:
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards address 0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629
- with symbol USDC, amount 5
[!NOTE] Notes: All requests for solutions should be chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default. The Orchestrator > > can check for 5 USDC on any chain for the above “from” address, and send a solution that receives > the 5 USDC on any other chain.
Request to Orchestrator
{
"id": 1234,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "orchestrator_findSolutions",
"params": {
"problems": [
{
"actions": [
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"address": "0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629"
},
"with": [
{
"symbol": "USDC",
"amount": 5
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
Response from Orchestrator
{
"id": 1234,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
{
"name": "Send 5 USDC",
"description": "Send 5 USDC from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165 to 0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629",
"transactions": [
{
"to": "0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
}
]
}
]
}
Swapping native token to USDC
The following request performs an action:
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards symbol USDC
- with: 0.1
[!NOTE] Notes: All requests for solutions should be chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default. The Orchestrator can take 0.1 native asset from any chain in return for USDC on any chain.
Request to Orchestrator
{
"id": 1337,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "orchestrator_findSolutions",
"params": {
"problems": [
{
"actions": [
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"symbol": "USDC"
},
"with": [
{
"amount": 0.1
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
Response from Orchestrator
{
"id": 1337,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
{
"name": "Swap 0.1 ETH for 371.498 USDC",
"description": "Swapping 0.1 ETH from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165 to 371.498 USDC via Uniswap",
"transactions": [
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
},
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x...",
"value": 0.1
}
]
}
]
}
Swapping multiple tokens to USDC
The following request performs an action:
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards symbol USDC
- with SHIB and / or Pillar
[!NOTE] Notes: All requests for solutions should be chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default. The Orchestrator can take any amount of SHIB and / or Pillar from any chain in return for an exchanged amount of USDC on any chain.
Request to Orchestrator
{
"id": 1234,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "orchestrator_findSolutions",
"params": {
"problems": [
{
"actions": [
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"symbol": "USDC"
},
"with": [
{
"symbol": "SHIB"
},
{
"symbol": "Pillar"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
Response from Orchestrator
{
"id": 1337,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
{
"name": "Swap 171,246 SHIB and 1004.72 Pillar for 10 USDC",
"description": "Swapping 171,246 SHIB and 1004.72 Pillar from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165 to 10 USDC via Uniswap",
"transactions": [
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
},
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
},
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x...",
"value": 0.1
}
]
}
]
}
Sending an ERC-20 token to multiple addresses
The following request performs the following actions:
- Action 1
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards address 0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629
- with 5 USDC
- Action 2
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards address 0xFCd239451346238B5560511Ae47A0b82b1bbE9f0
- with 100 PLR
[!NOTE] Notes: All requests for solutions should be chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default. The Orchestrator can move the specified asset amounts on any chain where the asset exists in the “from” address.
Request to Orchestrator
{
"id": 1000,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "orchestrator_findSolutions",
"params": {
"problems": [
{
"actions": [
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"address": "0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629"
},
"with": [
{
"symbol": "USDC",
"amount": 5
}
]
},
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"address": "0xFCd239451346238B5560511Ae47A0b82b1bbE9f0"
},
"with": [
{
"symbol": "PLR",
"amount": 100
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
Response from Orchestrator
{
"id": 1000,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
{
"name": "Send 5 USDC to 0x...629 and 100 PLR to 0x...9f0",
"description": "Send 5 USDC to 0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629 and 100 PLR to 0xFCd239451346238B5560511Ae47A0b82b1bbE9f0",
"transactions": [
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
},
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 1,
"calldata": "0x...",
"value": 0
}
]
}
]
}
Calling a Smart Contract function on Polygon: Inscribing a message which costs 1 USDC
The following request performs an action:
- from 0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165
- towards address 0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629 on chain 137
- with 1 USDC
- calling “inscribe” with “0x…”
[!NOTE] Notes: All requests for solutions should be chain abstracted (ChA¹) by default - HOWEVER in this example, the
chainIdproperty on theDestinationinterface has been specified. The operation should now be locked to the specified chain. BecausefunctionCallNameandfunctionCallDataexist, the Orchestrator can infer that this is a smart contract call and act accordingly.
Request to Orchestrator
{
"id": 420,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "orchestrator_findSolutions",
"params": {
"problems": [
{
"actions": [
{
"from": "0xbafB4E1EFA94B359e2E175CF6156AedA2cACa165",
"towards": {
"address": "0x50840CE036eEf2005d3c4d6f6Eb65f8116a01629",
"chainId": 137
},
"with": [
{
"symbol": "USDC",
"amount": 1
}
],
"functionCallName": "inscribe",
"functionCallData": "0x..."
}
]
}
]
}
}
Response from Orchestrator
{
"id": 420,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"result": [
{
"name": "Inscribe with 1 USDC",
"description": "Call the Inscribe function with 1 USDC on Polygon",
"transactions": [
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 137,
"calldata": "0x0...",
"value": 0
},
{
"to": "0x...",
"chainId": 137,
"calldata": "0x...",
"value": 0
}
]
}
]
}
Security Considerations
Orchestrator reputation
The ability for anyone to build an Orchestrator inherently brings the opportunity for code errors and therefore a degraded service. Orchestrators may also be abandoned over time. A reputation score should be leveraged by the Orchestrator to determine if the Orchestrator is fit for purpose. This should be up to the requesting system or wallet to determine.
Orchestrator producing dishonest solutions
An Orchestrator may return transactions as part of a solution that are wrong or attempt to take more than what was asked of it. Where possible, the Orchestrator should validate returned transaction address destinations and any other data.
Orchestrator personality variations
Whilst not a security consideration per-se, some Orchestrators may gravitate towards their own business targets which may skew the outcome of Orchestrator solutions. The systems or wallets requesting solutions from Orchestrators should be mindful of this unless it is intended.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.